It may even be reduced in price to compensate in the future. The 6500 XT is slightly newer and less expensive.
#1650 VS 1660 SUPER BENCHMARK DRIVERS#
This could be due to less mature drivers and less attention from game developers during optimisation. Despite the 6500 XT being theoretically faster, it's unable to match the pace of the 1660 SUPER. In other benchmarks, the conclusion is the same. It manages to edge out the 6500 XT in all of our tests. In our benchmarks, the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER beats the Radeon RX 6500 XT in terms of performance. However, on paper, the 6500 XT is slightly faster in raw performance numbers, but we will see how this translates to real world usage next. In most cases, the 1660 SUPER is the victor, with faster memory and more compute units. This can be something to keep in mind if you're going to be using the card for a few years. With too little memory, the card will not be as efficient since it will need to swap game data in and out of memory. Nvidia’s top value offering prior to the 1650S was the 70 more expensive 1660S which is around 18 faster but also 40 more expensive than the 1650S. With a lower TDP, the 1650S requires a less demanding thermal solution and therefore runs a lot quieter. With modern titles, this can have a significant impact on performance. The 1650S has a TDP of 100W which is 50 lower than a typical AMD 500 series card. One notable difference in that the 1660 SUPER has 6 GB of memory compared to the 6500 XT with only 4 GB. Specifications comparedīoth cards are competing in the same space, so they both have similar specs and power requirements.
#1650 VS 1660 SUPER BENCHMARK 1080P#
This is a great option for 1080p gaming and even 1440p gaming with slightly lower settings. It's the lowest end card in their 6000 series line up, but that doesn't mean it's slow. In response, AMD offers the Radeon RX 6500 XT with a slightly lower retail price, build on the tried and tested RDNA 2 architecture found in both the Xbox Series X and PS5 consoles. No doubt, this makes it a rather compelling option for the budget minded gamer. It is a GTX series card with no raytracing features, but with a comparable level of performance to the older but still capable RTX 2060. Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games: in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1660 is 200 faster than the GTX 1650. 4K resolution: GTX 1660 is 34.8 faster than GTX 1650. However, the status quo may be shifting with the 1660 SUPER. 1440p resolution: GTX 1660 is 33.3 faster than GTX 1650. In terms of pricing, these two cards are very close, so making a purchase decision will depend on features and performance.ĪMD is no stranger to budget GPUs, they've dominated this space for years, with NVIDIA focusing on the high-end line-up. But which performs the best for the money. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT are the best budget gaming GPUs from team green and team red. GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs Radeon RX 6500 XT compared
0 kommentar(er)
